"Sweet Trav" (thespunbearing)
04/10/2017 at 20:51 • Filed to: nerdthings, HTPC, RaspberryPI, SBC
6
10|
"Sweet Trav" (thespunbearing)
04/10/2017 at 20:51 • Filed to: nerdthings, HTPC, RaspberryPI, SBC | 6
| 10 |
Not Pictured : Toshiba Exceria 32 GB, the card so bad i returned it.
When I’m not doing car stuff I’m usually messing with some electronics project.
My recent endeavors have been single board computers Raspberry Pi 2/3/0/0w, Odroid XU4, Orange Pi PC, and PCDuino4 Nano.
I will write up individual reviews of each of those SBC’s, if anyone is interested.
But in using these, I have bought a lot of different SD cards (they act as the hard drive for the SBC), so I thought I would compare all of them for you. Having a fast SD is also important for nice digital cameras, Go-Pros, phones, etc.
I’ll be ranking these Worst To Best. With the noted exception of the Samsung EVO 64 because it has my Retropie Build on it with all my ROMS, it performs somewhere between the Microcenter 32 GB and the Sandisk 64 GB. To benchmark these cards I used !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! which is a common disk benchmarking tool.
First Up:
9. PNY 2GB Class 4 MicroSD Card.
I really only benchmarked this one out of sheer curiosity to see how it stacked up against a modern card, it failed miserably.
It hardly registered on the 4k writes. I think I bought this card in 2008? Amazing how far we have come
8: Sandisk UHS-1 8GB MicroSDHC
This is another older card I had laying around, for HTPC purposes, this card doesn’t suck, and I’m not sure why. It may have to do with the density of the NAND flash memory, which gives it surprisingly high 4k writes, which when running an OS from an SD makes a huge a difference. This card even outperforms some more expensive larger cards on 4k writes.
7: Toshiba Exeria 32GB UHS-3 32 GB MicroSDHC:
This thing is a turd.
The Toshiba Exceria was a case of too good to be true. Cheap, name brand, but horribly slow. So slow that I returned it. So slow that Toshiba was lying about the speed rating (UHS-3 has a 30MB min write speed) I would put it lower on the list, but it does technically outperform cards from 3-8 years ago.
6: Microcenter Class 10 16 GB Micro SDHC Card
This card would be perfectly at home in a cell phone as added storage, or a non DSLR camera. Not fast, not slow, and at $6.99 it’s cheap.
5: Microcenter Class 10 32 GB MicroSDHC Card
This one is $11.99 and offers a good bang for the buck. Generally, I would say this the best value, it performs well for the price but isn’t the fastest of the bunch. Note the improved 4k write speed over the 16gb model.
4: Sandisk UHS-1 64 GB MicroSDHC card
Geez that’s a big picture of a mediocre but fully compatible card
So the Sandisk 64 GB card is not the fastest by any means, but it works just fine in our Go-pro whereas the Samsung 64GB EVO card does not. For HTPC use it’s slow 4K writes hurt it, but its still has great sequential write speeds, which is important for HD video recording. With the Sandisk name, you do pay a little more for this card, but I haven’t had any compatibility issues with it.
3: Samsung EVO + 32GB MicroSDHC:
This card just barely edge out the Sandisk in terms of overall performance. It is pretty cheap too, I think I scored mine for $14.99. Better 4k writes at the sacrifice of a little sequential write speed. I haven’t checked to see if this works in my GoPro or not.
2: Samsung Pro UHS-1 32 GB MicroSDHC Card:
This card is UHS-1 in name only, the performance was so good that they discontinued this SD card, in favor of the UHS-3 rated and more expensive Pro+. Great all around card, but incompatible with my GoPro for some reason. One of the best for HTPC use though.
1: Toshiba PRO + UHS-3 32 GB MicroSDHC Card:
This is the fastest card that i have tested, I’m fairly certain though that they just discontinued the PRO and reclassified it a UHS-3 card and added plus at the end. The performance between the PRO and PRO+ is almost identical. This works perfect for HTPC/SBC applications, but I haven’t tested it on a GoPro yet to see how it performs. I got mine on sale for $22.99. If you’re going to get a Raspberry Pi I suggest this card, simply because of how fast it is to load new images to the board.
Conclusion:
When it comes to SD cards, you get what you pay for. That being said, there are cheaper cards that do an admirable job, like the 32 GB Microcenter Class 10 card, but if you don’t want to wait, pay twice as much for one of the top of the line Samsung cards. Oh and avoid those Toshiba Exceria cards like the plague.
Here is a google sheets link with the raw data:
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Let me know if you have any questions or comments below:
facw
> Sweet Trav
04/10/2017 at 20:55 |
|
fintail
> Sweet Trav
04/10/2017 at 21:16 |
|
I don’t know a ton about these, but I know my Blackvue dashcam has had creative differences with several 64GB cards. Then I read I should try a Lexar - flawless so far. Funny how things work. It also likes a basic 32 GB Sandisk Pixtor more than higher spec models.
Nibby
> Sweet Trav
04/10/2017 at 21:26 |
|
get on my level
|
Sweet Trav
> Nibby
04/10/2017 at 21:30 |
|
http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-microsd-card/ My Pro+ is faster, AND somewhere i still have a Quantum BigFoot HDD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Bigfoot
Phyrxes once again has a wagon!
> Sweet Trav
04/10/2017 at 21:54 |
|
Awesome write up, I’ll keep those in mind as I am in the market for SD cards for smart phones and while I don’t care too much about write speeds the price point is spot on.
BaconSandwich is tasty.
> Nibby
04/10/2017 at 23:54 |
|
420 MB, eh? Not too shabby. I remember my parent’s NEC 486 had a 520 (or was it 540?) MB hdd. We were constantly trying to find more room on it. Now I don’t think there’s a modern version of Windows that clocks under 10 GB.
|
Nibby
> BaconSandwich is tasty.
04/11/2017 at 08:22 |
|
Even those stupid cheap 32GB WIndows 10 machines are useless cause the second you update them, RIP free space
uofime-2
> Sweet Trav
04/11/2017 at 13:45 |
|
How exactly do the “ratings” on the cards work?
I see the number in the C which aparently goes to 10, 10 being best
then you also have the “U”’s
are those better than C’s, restarting from 1 and getting faster?
Are those numbers meaningful or mostly for marketing?
|
Sweet Trav
> uofime-2
04/11/2017 at 13:53 |
|
This should help clear things up. Yes the numbers are very important.
https://www.sdcard.org/developers/overview/speed_class/
|
uofime-2
> Sweet Trav
04/11/2017 at 16:06 |
|
Wow, so it directly relates to sequential write speed.
Looks like the microcenter cheapy card doesn’t actually live up to its rated speed.
So, should mean something but don’t count on it.